Sex in female urine tract

Comments (33)

Yogul wrote 10.02.2018, 16:24: #1
Lol science doesn't concern itself with morals

Kemuro wrote 16.02.2018, 06:30: #2
Homelessness isn't a career.

Moramar wrote 16.02.2018, 15:16: #3
You do not understand either DNA or evaluation or both. The existence of DNA does not "prove" Darwin's theory of evolution (I will abbreviate this as DTE for less typing sake). It could possibly lend some understanding to how DTE could have worked, however, as we uncover the incredible complexity of DNA in particular and the cell in general, DTE is getting more difficult to accept.

Kigarn wrote 22.02.2018, 08:55: #4
You are forgetting that PP profits from abortions... they WANT those girls to get molested and knocked up again. That is why they send them back...

Mazuzragore wrote 25.02.2018, 13:33: #5
Hmmmm all those pilots are men...

Takus wrote 04.03.2018, 06:37: #6
It *seems* so. I mean, you've left some great posts elsewhere but you seem to be unwilling to engage with mine, other than to make a middle-school-level joke.

Vudogar wrote 12.03.2018, 04:40: #7
We tried to tell all u bleeding heart libs that this is exactly what would happen lol

Motaur wrote 18.03.2018, 05:06: #8
That position is held by a small group of scholars called the revisionists, who hold that the entire OT postdates the Exile and the Mesopotamian connections all come from the Exile. Israel Finkelstein is probably their most well-known adherent. They defend their ideas with a constant game of whack-a-mole against any evidence that any layers of the OT are earlier. For example, they have to argue that on the Merenptah stela, "Israel" does not actually say "Israel." The more mainstream view is that the older strata of the OT go back at least to the 8th century BCE.

Shakazragore wrote 23.03.2018, 12:58: #9
People Eating Tasty Animals don't waste it with a photo fry it in a pan.

Grogami wrote 01.04.2018, 15:19: #10
It is rather foolish to imagine that you can prove that (That God does not exist).

Doujar wrote 05.04.2018, 09:06: #11
Buy a PC membership for twenty bucks (it's tax deductible!) and have your say up close and personal.

Akinonris wrote 14.04.2018, 13:54: #12
Unlikely, since our universe does not seem destined to have any progeny. Why would we be the last in line?

Gusho wrote 23.04.2018, 10:48: #13
Me when it's time to go home after work...

Faugore wrote 03.05.2018, 03:16: #14
Sure they do, yet they need to apply and go thru that process. Which takes time, and ECB only caters to members.

Akinocage wrote 04.05.2018, 19:50: #15
Yeah, the raw data is probably even more striking. It's kind of like finding that every desktop computer, regardless of age, executes the same x86 instructions. What does that tell you about the origin of PCs? They immediately resort to an evolutionary interpretation, but I think the significance may lie in another direction entirely.

Kajizahn wrote 10.05.2018, 15:49: #16
No, you're making it up.

Mikazuru wrote 19.05.2018, 06:06: #17
Christianity was less that 5% of the population in 325CE at the Council of Nicea. The single most important person in the entire history of Christianity was Helena, Constantine's mother, who became a Christian and influenced her son. There is only Eusebius of Caesarea's word that Constantine allowed himself the be baptized on his deathbed, but it is well known that he continued to worship Sol Invictus and there are pagan symbols of Constantine's Arch, but not Christian symbols.

Tauzilkree wrote 25.05.2018, 22:35: #18
International House of Bitches?

Nikolabar wrote 02.06.2018, 13:26: #19
Star Trek might be a better resource in this sense.

Zura wrote 09.06.2018, 09:20: #20
I used to be a play leader in an adventure playground. The one thing we always prevented was the setting up of forts or camps. As soon as it happened, and a group formed, things would start flying and many tears would be shed.

Tygogal wrote 15.06.2018, 22:29: #21
Nope. If he gave us our lives, then our lives are ours, not his. He gave Earth to man, so therefore it isn't his anymore.

Mazugor wrote 26.06.2018, 09:09: #22
I wouldn't say it like that, since the Islamic instuctions was and still can be applied. It just missing the Islamic nations to apply for the victory to be regained. If u can't see a connection between how proper worshipping ALLAH can bring victory, well, that's something that been clarified by ALLAH

Tekasa wrote 05.07.2018, 00:54: #23
That holds absolutely zero reason to believe in a fine tuned universe or even reason to assume it. The far simpler and far more concurrent understanding of reality gives us reason to believe WE are tuned to exist here, not the other way around. Something that is accounted for by the well understood principals of evolution. But tell me more about the opinion piece you cited as research into the "idea" of fine tuning.

Samukasa wrote 09.07.2018, 00:29: #24
Oh, sorry, I edited my reply to ask what original post you meant ;)

Yozshugore wrote 19.07.2018, 11:30: #25
Unions and Tenure

Kigasar wrote 23.07.2018, 06:03: #26
The rest of the century baby! TBA!

Malanris wrote 26.07.2018, 00:50: #27
The South will Rise Again :) hehe

Tygorg wrote 03.08.2018, 06:40: #28
How twisted and perverted is the theist mind.

Kajishakar wrote 05.08.2018, 22:21: #29
Holy smokes....I am debating a complete fool?

Vodal wrote 15.08.2018, 16:16: #30
Physical stuff is made exclusively out of atoms. Correct? And those atoms of various types have their own built in energy and unique electro/magnetic signature. They got that out of the big bang. Your body is made exclusively out of those atoms. You say your body is alive. But you also say that the atoms that make up your living body are not alive? How is that possible? Again, if the atoms are not alive, literally, WHAT are you saying is alive?

Malanos wrote 18.08.2018, 09:53: #31
What a whinefest MrC is putting on tonight. It's pathetic.

Dishicage wrote 24.08.2018, 14:05: #32
Archaeopteryx, a really nice split.

Shakat wrote 29.08.2018, 22:11: #33
Maybe this will help a bit: You can also win Monopoly without owning Boardwalk.

Comment on: